{"id":292,"date":"2016-08-16T18:44:44","date_gmt":"2016-08-16T09:44:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/?p=292"},"modified":"2016-08-17T11:11:51","modified_gmt":"2016-08-17T02:11:51","slug":"explaining-yasukuni","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/explaining-yasukuni\/","title":{"rendered":"Yasukuni and the Politics of Remembrance"},"content":{"rendered":"

Yasukuni Shrine is a place and a political controversy that features in a number of posts on this site. Many of the views you’ll read about the shrine are shrill and one-sided; I thought it might be useful, as a reference piece, to write up something more balanced about the shrine’s history and its present role in politics and society.<\/em><\/p>\n

August 15th marks the anniversary of Japan’s surrender and the end of the Second World War. It’s an important and emotive date for many Japanese people.\u00a0Many still alive today\u00a0recall the\u00a0events of 71 years ago. Countless others have memories of parents, siblings or friends lost to the war. The anniversary, by coincidence, falls during Japan’s Obon festival,\u00a0during which\u00a0the souls of one’s ancestors are worshipped, and graves and shrines visited.<\/p>\n

In recent years, August 15th has taken on large and\u00a0unfortunate significance for observers of Japanese politics and East Asian geopolitics. It’s become a barometer for the strength of Japan’s right-wing,\u00a0revisionist political lobby, who argue for an end to the nation’s post-war order and to “masochistic” views of wartime history. Related to this, it is a barometer for the state of the relationships between Japan and its nearest neighbours, South Korea and China.<\/p>\n

At the heart of that significance sits Yasukuni Shrine. Prime Minister Koizumi Junichiro lit\u00a0a match under the shrine’s political role when,\u00a0in 2002, he pledged\u00a0to make official visits to the shrine each year. The power of that pledge\u00a0within certain nationalist circles points to the significance of Yasukuni beyond being a war memorial. While for the vast majority of its visitors it is a site at which to pray for ancestors who died in the service of Japan, for others it has become a way to deliberately provoke and strike out at China, at South Korea and at Japan’s own pacifist majority.<\/p>\n

This is not\u00a0how Yasukuni Shrine was envisioned at the outset. Originally established by the order of the Meiji Emperor in 1869 to commemorate the war dead of\u00a0the conflicts which ended the Shogunate and created modern Japan, its role has expanded to cover the commemoration of almost 2.5 million named soldiers who died during various wars (at the main shrine), all of those who have died in the service of Japan, including non-Japanese nationals\u00a0(at the Honden building), and all victims of the Second World War, regardless of affiliation or nationality (at the Chinreisha building).<\/p>\n

In that regard, Yasukuni is not\u00a0dissimilar to a national war memorial like Arlington Cemetery in Washington. The vast majority of Japanese people who visit Yasukuni do so for the same reason that Americans visit Arlington; they come to pay their respects to family members who died\u00a0in the service of their country (however misguided their country’s aims may have been at that time).<\/p>\n

Yasukuni’s contested political role\u00a0arises from its crucial differences from\u00a0Arlington. The post-war Constitution of Japan created a fairly strict separation of Church and State – or in this case, Shrine and State – which meant that Yasukuni Shrine could no longer be a state war memorial. The occupation authorities originally planned to raze the shrine entirely, but were persuaded to keep it by the intervention of the Roman Catholic Church, so\u00a0it was handed\u00a0a private religious corporation. This\u00a0has led to a complex situation wherein neither the government nor the Emperor can exercise control over the nation’s most important and internationally recognised war memorial.<\/p>\n

The lack of official state control\u00a0was largely unimportant until the late 1970s, when one Matsudaira Nagayoshi took over as chief priest of the shrine. Matsudaira was a historical revisionist who rejected the verdict of the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal and took it upon himself to add (“enshrine”) the names of all 14 convicted class-A war criminals at the shrine in a secret ceremony in 1978.<\/p>\n

Matsudaira retired in 1992 and died in 2005, but his influence on Yasukuni remains powerful and damaging. The Showa Emperor refused to visit the shrine in the wake of Matsudaira’s appointment and the secret enshrinement of the war criminals. His son, the present Emperor, has taken the same stance, and no member of the Imperial Family has visited the shrine – which lies only minutes away from the palace – since 1975. Many Prime Ministers have also chosen to avoid Yasukuni, especially in the wake of harsh criticism from China when Prime Minister Nakasone visited in 1985. Given the legal separation of state from religion, Japan’s symbolic and actual leaders are powerless to intervene in affairs at the shrine or demand the removal of the war criminals from the shrine’s registers (which its religious authorities insist is impossible). For the past thirty years,\u00a0most\u00a0leaders have\u00a0taken the only option remaining to them – snubbing Yasukuni\u00a0entirely.<\/p>\n

The influence of Matsudaira and of the revisionists whose reign at Yasukuni he ushered in\u00a0is also felt in physical form. The shrine’s grounds house controversial memorials that directly challenge the established historical narrative of the war and the guilt of Japan’s convicted war criminals. Chief among them is\u00a0the Yushukan – a war museum which is an exercise in dichotomy, with genuinely powerful\u00a0exhibits from the war being grotesquely undermined by accompanying text and interpretation that has one foot in fantasy and the other in farce.<\/p>\n

Given this, it’s not hard to see how official visits from government ministers inflame tensions with Japan’s neighbours, whose people were the victims of the war criminals enshrined there and whose suffering is deliberately questioned and erased by the childishly fantastical reimagining\u00a0of history in the Yushukan. Cognisant of that, and either wiser or more capable of listening to good advice than he’s often given credit for, current Prime Minister Abe Shinzo has steered clear of Yasukuni Shrine since 2013. Other cabinet ministers and members of the Diet have been less circumspect; this year, Olympics Minister Marukawa Tamayo and Communications Minister Takaichi Sanae (previously noted on this blog for her threats to shut down broadcasters who don’t toe the government line<\/a>) visited, as did former Defense Minister Nakatani Gen. It’s not only LDP ministers who visit Yasukuni; there is a cross-party group of MPs who lobby for politicians to make official trips to the shrine, and among this year’s August 15th visitors was Democratic Party leadership hopeful Nagashima Akihisa.<\/p>\n

Other Diet members and ministers made private visits earlier, or will do so later. Criticism of those private visits is\u00a0somewhat distasteful; whatever else Yasukuni has come to symbolise, it remains a place at\u00a0which countless Japanese people, including Diet members, pray for departed ancestors and to give thanks to millions of people\u00a0who gave their lives for the nation. It is important to draw a line between those who visit for private moments of worship and those who arrive with pomp, insist that their visit is official rather than personal, and make certain the cameras are waiting. Michael Cucek rightly describes this contrast as being between those who visit out of reverence, and those who visit out of a desire to transgress<\/a>. If it seems to be in terribly bad taste to use a shrine commemorating a nation’s war dead and enshrining the relatives of millions of Japanese people simply as a way to jam one’s thumb in the eye of neighbours with whom you don’t get along, well, that’s because it absolutely is.<\/p>\n

This is not to say that China and South Korea are blameless in how this dispute has developed. Both countries are guilty of stirring up national anger over Japan and\u00a0wartime history in order to deflect attention from various failures of their own governments. There’s a long, long tradition of this in the post-war era. The Communist Party in China has always emphasised and on occasion enhanced Japanese wartime brutality not least in order to draw attention from its own\u00a0brutality in the years after the war. South Korea’s post-war military dictatorship quietly took reparation money from Japan without informing its populace or distributing it to victims for whom it was intended,\u00a0instead teaching its citizens that Japan had never apologised or paid reparations. In the case of both nations, matters of wartime history are\u00a0made even more murky by the promotion of versions of history that, while closer to the truth than those of Japan’s historical revisionists, remain problematic and one-sided.<\/p>\n

This all points to the fundamental problem with Yasukuni, with August 15th and with the whole question of how the war and its remembrance feeds into East Asian geopolitics. The problem is that almost none of this is actually about the war, or about history. It’s about contemporary issues; it’s about the fear, in Japan, of a declining nation thrown into sharp relief by the rise of China. It’s about the fear in both South Korea and China of an end to decades of rapid economic growth, and the prospect of a future not unlike Japan’s lost decades. It’s about concerns about political stability and national identity, and the utility of\u00a0an external foe to focus attention away from stagnation and social problems at home. Each of the three governments shares some unequal portion of the blame for using history not as a way to establish fact, and remembrance not as a way to learn from the past and avoid its mistakes, instead using\u00a0both as tools to achieve cynical, short-term political ends.<\/p>\n

Yasukuni itself, however, remains an internal Japanese problem. The duality of its nature, simultaneously\u00a0a legitimate place of worship and commemoration and a site for transgression and right-wing peacocking, makes it a thornier problem than many observers admit.\u00a0Suggestions that the nearby Chidorigafuchi\u00a0National Cemetery, a state-operated and much less controversial memorial, should replace Yasukuni as the focus for remembrance are simplistic and slightly naive. They misunderstand the differing roles of the memorials; the secular Chidorigafuchi\u00a0is a “Tomb of the Unknown Soldier”, honouring some 350,000 soldiers whose remains could not be identified. The religious Yasukuni is a much more broad-ranging memorial and, crucially, enshrines the specifically named souls of some 2.5 million people. Removing Yasukuni from the nation’s rituals of war memory is an unreasonable demand. Expecting neighbouring countries to smile and nod at the deliberate provocation of politicians acting in an official capacity is equally unreasonable.<\/p>\n

The “solution”, if any such thing can be achieved, will be a fudged, unofficial compromise – a return to a status quo in which nothing has actually been solved, but Japanese governments put their senior officials on shorter leashes, while Chinese and Korean authorities mute the tone of their statements. There’s some evidence of movement in that direction over the past couple of years, of a slow de-escalation of rhetoric and provocation around Yasukuni. Given time to bed in, perhaps such a compromise will allow Japanese people to commemorate\u00a0their lost relatives at Yasukuni without rude interference from their own nation’s right-wing fringe.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Yasukuni Shrine is a place and a political controversy that features in a number of posts on this site. Many of the views you’ll read about the shrine are shrill and one-sided; I thought it might be useful, as a reference piece, to write up something more balanced about the shrine’s history and its present …<\/p>\n

Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":298,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[40,49],"tags":[87,62,149,274,273,268,272,270,269,271,264,265],"class_list":["post-292","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-japan","category-politics","tag-abe","tag-abe-shinzo","tag-china","tag-koizumi","tag-koizumi-junichiro","tag-nakatani","tag-pacific-war","tag-second-world-war","tag-south-korea","tag-ww2","tag-yasukuni","tag-yasukuni-shrine"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/08\/Yasukuni_Shrine.jpg?fit=594%2C279","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p71QYy-4I","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":701,"url":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/trump-is-no-gift-for-abe-and-the-ldp\/","url_meta":{"origin":292,"position":0},"title":"Trump is no gift for Abe and the LDP","author":"Rob Fahey","date":"11\/11\/2016","format":false,"excerpt":"As Japan's establishment and observers start to come to grips with\u00a0the implications of a Trump administration for the country, one comment I've heard a lot\u00a0is that this is a gift for Shinzo Abe and his inner circle. It clears the way for them to enact their long dreamed-of reforms, which\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "japan"","block_context":{"text":"japan","link":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/category\/japan\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/Abe-Shinzo.jpg?fit=592%2C281&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/Abe-Shinzo.jpg?fit=592%2C281&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/Abe-Shinzo.jpg?fit=592%2C281&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":133,"url":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/oh-what-a-lovely-war-bill\/","url_meta":{"origin":292,"position":1},"title":"Oh! What a Lovely War Bill","author":"Rob Fahey","date":"16\/07\/2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Today, Japan's lower house of government, the House of Representatives (broadly equivalent to the House of Commons in the UK, and rather\u00a0less equivalent to the US Congress),\u00a0has passed bills permitting Japanese military forces to participate in action against nations which are not directly attacking Japan. This will be the first\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "japan"","block_context":{"text":"japan","link":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/category\/japan\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"JSDF troops with their flag","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Flag_of_JSDF20070408.jpg?fit=593%2C302&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Flag_of_JSDF20070408.jpg?fit=593%2C302&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Flag_of_JSDF20070408.jpg?fit=593%2C302&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":160,"url":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/abes-reshuffle-gun-is-firing-blanks\/","url_meta":{"origin":292,"position":2},"title":"Abe’s Reshuffle Gun is Firing Blanks","author":"Rob Fahey","date":"19\/10\/2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Cabinet reshuffles are a big deal in Japanese politics. Where in other nations a reshuffle is generally of interest only to those with skin in the game and those desperately afflicted with a fascination with politics (it\u2019s no way for a person to live, I assure you), in Japan reshuffles\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "japan"","block_context":{"text":"japan","link":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/category\/japan\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/Abe-Shinzo.jpg?fit=592%2C281&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/Abe-Shinzo.jpg?fit=592%2C281&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/10\/Abe-Shinzo.jpg?fit=592%2C281&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":146,"url":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/security-bill-passes-what-next-for-japanese-politics\/","url_meta":{"origin":292,"position":3},"title":"Security bill passes; what next for Japanese politics?","author":"Rob Fahey","date":"20\/09\/2015","format":false,"excerpt":"Japan\u2019s controversial and widely disliked new security bill was passed into law early on Saturday morning, as the LDP, their coalition partner Komeito, and a handful of smaller parties pushed the bill through the Upper House following weeks of protests both outside and inside the Diet. It\u2019s been a messy\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "japan"","block_context":{"text":"japan","link":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/category\/japan\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/National_Diet_Building_-_Tokyo_Japan_-_DSC06736.jpg?fit=593%2C284&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/National_Diet_Building_-_Tokyo_Japan_-_DSC06736.jpg?fit=593%2C284&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/National_Diet_Building_-_Tokyo_Japan_-_DSC06736.jpg?fit=593%2C284&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":227,"url":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/japans-lgbt-tipping-point\/","url_meta":{"origin":292,"position":4},"title":"Japan’s LGBT Tipping Point","author":"Rob Fahey","date":"09\/05\/2016","format":false,"excerpt":"Yesterday, Tokyo hosted the Rainbow Pride Parade - the city\u2019s annual celebration of LGBT people and sexual minorities in Japan, now in its fifth year. The parade is the culmination of a week of Pride-related events, political, social and artistic, and is accompanied by a two-day festival at Yoyogi Park.\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "gender"","block_context":{"text":"gender","link":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/category\/gender\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/RainbowPride.jpg?fit=593%2C261&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/RainbowPride.jpg?fit=593%2C261&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/RainbowPride.jpg?fit=593%2C261&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]},{"id":301,"url":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/japan-military-budget-increase\/","url_meta":{"origin":292,"position":5},"title":"Restraint, not Aggression, in Japan’s Military Budget Increase","author":"Rob Fahey","date":"02\/09\/2016","format":false,"excerpt":"The remilitarisation of Japan is a popular theme for the international media. It gives a clear, dramatic narrative to international news coverage that might otherwise bore readers. In this narrative Japan's leadership seek to cast off the shackles of\u00a0the post-1945 world order, to rewrite the pacifist constitution, rebuild their military\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "japan"","block_context":{"text":"japan","link":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/category\/japan\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"JSDF troops with their flag","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Flag_of_JSDF20070408.jpg?fit=593%2C302&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Flag_of_JSDF20070408.jpg?fit=593%2C302&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/07\/Flag_of_JSDF20070408.jpg?fit=593%2C302&resize=525%2C300 1.5x"},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=292"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":299,"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/292\/revisions\/299"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=292"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=292"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.robfahey.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=292"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}